Yanaki Milev vs Cosmin Ontica Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Ontica

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 47.64% of points on their second serve, while Ontica has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 53.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ontica has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 58.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ontica has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 58.46% of matches played (W/L 38/ 27), with Ontica winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 78/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ontica has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 78/ 75), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
• Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.39% of matches (W/L 34/ 15), where as Ontica has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 0 times and Ontica being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Milev winning 1 and Ontica winning 0. The last match between Milev and Ontica was at the M15 Burgas, 06-10-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory 4-3 ret..
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Ontica have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milev winning 0 times and Ontica 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 0, and Ontica 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.18 while Ontica has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ontica has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ontica has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)